The evidence layer between session activity and reviewable proof.
Turn raw session activity into structured evidence — so regulated teams stop rebuilding the record after the fact.
No credit card required
Strengthens the evidence layer. Does not replace your stack.
TimeToPoint sits between session activity and downstream review. It does not replace delivery tools or LMS workflows. It strengthens the evidence layer that helps teams explain what happened later.
Webinar tools help deliver. LMS tools help assign and complete. TTP helps create a more reviewable evidence record around participation and continuity.
Stronger records from the training activity you already have.
Most regulated teams already capture some attendance or completion data. The problem comes later: fragmented logs, manual reconstruction, and reviewers trying to work out what actually happened. TimeToPoint turns raw session activity into a record that is easier to review, export, and defend.
Attendance verification
Timing-based attendance evidence, not just present / absent.
Continuity and participation markers
Show whether participation remained continuous enough to support later review.
Reviewer-friendly outputs
Create records that compliance, QA, and governance teams can understand without reconstructing the session from raw files.
Exception and review handling
If participation drops, gaps appear, or a record needs attention, the session can be flagged for human review instead of being treated as silently complete.
Exportable records
Move evidence into wider reporting, retention, or review workflows.
Retention-aware handling
Keep evidence structured for environments where record discipline matters.
No credit card required
Connect. Verify. Defend.
Three steps. One usable evidence record.
Connect
Capture attendance, timing, and participation inputs from the delivery environment or training workflow.
Verify
Turn raw signals into a structured session record with continuity markers, exception notes, and reviewer-friendly context.
Defend
Generate evidence artifacts that move cleanly into compliance, QA, governance, or audit-preparation workflows.
TimeToPoint processes session timing and participation signals. It does not rely on learning content, assessment responses, or individual performance data to produce the evidence record.
Start with a usable output and a clear operational path. Add complexity only when it earns its place.
Clear scope makes evaluation easier.
Not an LMS replacement
TTP does not replace learning assignment, content delivery, or completion administration.
Not a webinar platform
TTP does not replace the tools used to run live delivery.
Not intrusive monitoring
TTP is evidence-first verification around participation and continuity.
Not an automatic compliance guarantee
TTP strengthens reviewable records. It does not claim that every regulatory requirement is automatically satisfied.
This product is easier to evaluate when the scope is clear from the start.
What your reviewer actually sees
A structured evidence record designed for the question that comes later.
When a reviewer opens a TimeToPoint evidence record, they see the session title and date, a summary with participant count and active-time context, a timeline showing join and leave events, continuity markers indicating whether participation remained sustained, the current review state, and export actions for wider handling.
Not a log file. Not a screenshot folder. A structured evidence record for later review.
Start narrow. Expand once the evidence model is clear.
A pilot can begin with one workflow, one team, or one output requirement. Deeper integration comes after the evidence record, review flow, and operational fit are understood.
Connector path
Use existing delivery or LMS data where available.
API path
Integrate directly when tighter control over data flow and output handling is required.
Manual upload / pilot path
Test the evidence model before rollout, without forcing a large systems change on day one.
What TTP needs
Session attendance or timing data
A way to identify participants
A defined review owner or review workflow
What TTP does not need
Access to learning content or assessment data
A full platform replacement
Maximum system complexity on day one
The goal is not new chaos during delivery. The goal is a cleaner record afterwards. Fits around existing trainer or coordinator habits. Supports evaluation without forcing a heavyweight new process.
No credit card required
See the evidence flow in your own workflow.
Start with one regulated training stream. Evaluate the evidence model before expanding scope.
No large platform replacement required. No credit card required.