Start with one workflow. Price what you actually need.
TimeToPoint pricing follows deployment scope — workflow size, evidence complexity, and integration depth. Designed so a pilot is commercially proportionate to a single evaluation decision.
No credit card required
Evaluate the workflow first. Expand the scope later.
You do not need an enterprise-wide commitment to test whether the evidence model works. Start with one team, one workflow, or one training stream. Expand only when record quality, stakeholder fit, and procurement confidence are proven.
Pilot investment proportionate to a single workflow decision
No enterprise-wide rollout required to begin
Expand only when the evidence model and operational fit are clear
Pricing scales with deployment reality, not marketing tiers
The goal is to make the pilot investment proportionate to the decision being made.
No credit card required
Three commercial entry points
Pilot
For one team, one training stream, or one workflow where the goal is to test the evidence model, reviewer experience, and operational fit.
Department
For organisations standardising evidence handling across multiple related workflows or business-unit-level training operations.
Enterprise
For organisations with multi-team deployment, deeper procurement scrutiny, or more demanding security, governance, or integration needs.
Pricing follows deployment reality.
TimeToPoint pricing is shaped by workflow scope, review complexity, and deployment depth — not by a generic seat-based software tier.
Shaped by
Number of workflows, sessions, or learners in scope
Number of administrators, reviewers, or stakeholder groups
Output and export requirements
Evidence lifecycle expectations
Deployment and integration depth
Onboarding, support, and rollout planning scope
Not based on
Total employee count
Unused feature access
Arbitrary seat minimums
Pilot engagements are designed to be commercially proportionate to evaluating a single workflow or training stream.
You are already paying the cost of weak evidence.
The real comparison is not only software cost. It is also the cost of weak records: manual reconstruction, fragmented proof, review delays, and uncertainty when evidence is needed quickly.
Reduce post-session reconstruction work
Improve reviewer confidence in the record
Make outputs easier to move across teams
Lower friction in evidence-heavy workflows
If the team is already paying the price in time, rework, and ambiguity, the software line item is only part of the picture.
Most buyers begin with a contained scope.
Pilot one workflow
Use one training stream or one review path to test the evidence model.
Review outputs and stakeholder fit
See whether compliance, QA, governance, or client-facing stakeholders find the record useful.
Decide whether to expand
Increase scope only when the record quality and operational fit are proven.
If the pilot demonstrates value, pricing moves to Department or Enterprise terms based on expanded scope. There is no penalty for starting small.
Common pricing and commercial questions
Scope the right starting point.
Tell us which workflow you want to evaluate, what kind of evidence output you need, and who needs to review it. We will help you scope the most appropriate commercial entry point.
No credit card required to start a pilot.